PEOPLE

Justin Baldoni accuses Lively to press Taylor Swift

Photo: Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni /Courtesy
Photo: Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni /Courtesy

The legal confrontation between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni For the filming of the film to break the circle continues to climb and already involves figures such as Taylor Swift.

On May 14, Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedmanpresented a letter and affidavit before the judge Lewis J. Limanclaiming that Lively’s legal team tried extort Swift to publicly support it on the dispute.

You may be interested: Exclusive! Justin Bieber speaks behind the accusations against Diddy: What did he say?

According to Freedman, an anonymous source revealed that a Lively lawyer threatened to disseminate private text messages Between the actress and Swift, unless the latter offered a Public declaration In favor of Lively. Even Swift would have been requested from eliminating the conversations of the last four or five months.

The judge borders the accusations for considering them “Improper“E”Irrelevant”, And warned possible sanctions against Freedman for searching public scandal. Lively’s legal team described allegations as “categorically false”And he accused the lawyers of Wayfarer of acting without evidence.

Photo: Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni /Courtesy
Photo: Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni /Courtesy

Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni

The origin of the conflict dates from December 2024, when Lively denounced Baldoni for sexual harassment and work reprisalsdetailing episodes such as unseeled kissescomments about your body, weight loss and a work environment hostile.

Baldoni responded in January 2025 with a defamation and extortion contrademanda, demanding 400 million dollars. He said that Lively sought to take creative control of the film and that his accusations were a maneuver to displace him from the project.

Photo: Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni /Courtesy
Photo: Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni /Courtesy

Taylor Swifton the other hand, he has denied all participation in production and has asked to stay out of dispute, whose judgment is scheduled for March 2026. The plot promises to continue generating headlines.

Who

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button