The complete list of artists who appear in the demand against the singer

Taylor Swift has been sued for committing alleged violation of copyright by Kimberly Marasco, a Florida artist that accuses the singer, her producer and other composers and music stars for supposedly having copied your work without authorization or credit and taking creative elements.

Second demand for Marasco against Taylor Swift

Marasco had already sued Swift in April 2024 ensuring that several songs and videos of the albums Lover, Folklore, midnights and The tortured poets department cThey ontenan creative elements of their authorship.

In addition to Swift, composers are also mentioned in the demand Jack Artonoff and Aaron Dessner, in addition to Universal Music Group and Republic Recordsaccording to a Newsweek report.

Read too

Carlos Mayorga

The complaint filed last February accuses Dessner for his work in Taylor Swift songs such as Hoax and Death by a Thousand Cuts.

The list of personalities that appear in the demand against Taylor Swift

In the lawsuit, mention of a poem written by Marasco published in its X (formerly Twitter) account is made dedicated to Elon Musk and entitled ‘Elon = Mc2’, According to her, he refers to “Elon as a genius” And they compare it with the lyrics of the song ‘Mastermind’ where Swift mentions “to evaluate the IT equation.”

According to Marasco, describe a person with a mathematical equation It is “disturbingly similar to the expression where it refers to Elon Musk as an equation.”

In demand, mention is also made of Lady Gaga, who allegedly made a “surprisingly similar” pose To a sketch that Marasco used on the cover of his book, which proves that the music industry knew his work.

Marasco also mentions other celebrities such as Elton John, Kim Kardashian, Brad Paisley, Chaka Khan, although in no case under the accusation of plagiarism

“As a direct or immediate result of the illicit conduct of the defendants, The plaintiff has suffered irreparable damage. These damages persist and will not decrease in the future. Said reproduction and dissemination were totally unauthorized, since it was made without license or consent of the applicant, ”says the claim.