Miami.- Justin Baldoni continues to add accusations against Blake Lively in the contrademanda that filed the actress. Now, the actor and director of It ends with us He argues that the interpreter sought to extort her friend, the singer Taylor Swift to support her publicly in the midst of the legal battle.
Bryan Freedman, Baldoni’s lawyer, said in a letter and affidavit that presented to the Judge Lewis J. Limanthat Lively, through his legal team, asked the interpreter of Cruel Summer Eliminate messages and conversations developed on different platforms of the last five months.
Also, Freedman alleges that the purpose of the action was to erase clues about the possible conversations that referred to the conflict.
However, the judge dismissed and described the accusations of Baldoni suddenly and warned that they face possible sanctions if they return to present a document that aims to promote the media scandal.
After transcending this event, Lively’s team denied the accusations.
“This is categorically false. We flatly denied all these supposed accusations, which are cowardly based on alleged anonymous sources and are completely away from reality. This is what we expect from Wayfarer’s lawyers, who seem to prefer to shoot first, without any evidence and regardless of the people they harm. We will present motions before the court so that these lawyers pay accounts for their misconduct.”
Shil Swift should declare in the trial?
Mike Gottlieb, a lawyer from Blake Lively, said in past weeks that there is no clarity in itself the statements of the celebrities that have been mentioned in the demand may be relevant to the case.
“It is not entirely clear what allegations or defenses in the case of any of these celebrities … they have some relevance. This case is about what happened to Blake Lively when he denounced sexual harassment on the set. It is not about how the songs were chosen for the movie. It is not about the fictitious characters of Marvel in the movies of Deadpool“
“You have to ask, so, why are these people cited? Do they have any real relevance for the case in question? You cannot quote people for being famous and think that it will generate many headlines. And the federal courts do not tolerate that kind of behavior,” he emphasized.
