Taylor Swift no Longer Subpoenaed by Justin Baldoni in Blake Lively Legal Dispute

Justin Baldoni has dropped the Document Subpoena That Was Issued To Taylor Swift in His Ongoing Legal Battle With The Singer’s Friend Blake Lively.

A Spokesperson for Lively confirm the news on Thursday, May 22, Saying in A Statement obtained by People That They are “pleased” Baldoni’s Legal Team you ”

“We Supported The Efforts of Taylor’s Team to quash inappuroprothe subpoenas directed to her counsel, and we Will Continue to Stand Up for Any Third Party is is unjustly harassed or Threatened in the Process,” Adds The Spokesperson.

“The Baldoni and Wayfarer Team Have Tried to Put Taylor Swift, A Woman Who Has Been An Inspiration For Tens of Millions Across The Globe, At The Center of This Case Since Since Day One,” Lively’s Rep Claimed. “Exploiting taylor swift’s celebrity was the original plan in melissa nathan’s scenario planning document, and it continues to this day. Faced with haVing to justify Thanmselves in Federal Court, They Folded. At Suba Sum Point The Will Run Out of Distractions From The Current Claims of Sex they are facing. ”

REPS FOR BALDONI DID NOT IMMmedialy Respond to People’s Requests for Comment. A rep for swift you have not compared to People.

The People App is now available in the Apple App Store! Download It Now for the Most Binge-Worthy Celeb Content, Exclusive Video Clips, Astrology Updates and More!

After the subpoena was issued Earlier This months, a spokesperson for swift releases Statement Emphasizing That Swift, 35, had no close connection to the filming of It ends with us.

“Taylor Swift Never Set Foot On The Set of This Movie, She was not Involved in Any casting or Creative Decions, She Did Not Score The Film, She Never Saw An Edit Or Made Any Notes On The Film, She Did Not Even See See It ends with us Until Weeks After its Public Relay, and was Traveling Around the Globe During 2023 and 2024 Headling The Biggest Tour in History, “Swift’s Rep Said.

“The Connection Taylor had to this film was permilling the use of one song, ‘My Tears Ricochet.’ Given that Her Involvement was Licensing A Song for The Film, Which 19 Oher Artists Also Did, This Document Subpoena is designated to use Taylor Swift’s Name to Draw Public Interest By Creating Tabloid Tablid Clickbait Instead of Focusing on The Facts of The Case, “The Spokesperson Continue.

On May 14, Baldoni’s Attorneys Also Broucht Forth A Bombshell Claim in A Letter to The Judge, Alleging They Had Learned Through an Anonymous “Source” That Lively Had Threatened To Relay Private Texts Between Her and Swift if the Singer Did not publicly support her. Lively’s Attorney, Mike Gottlieb, Slammed the Allegation As “Categorically False.”

Judge Lewis J. Liman granteed a motion on May 15 to Strike The Letter From The Record, calling it “Improper” and “Irrelevant to Any Issue Before This Court.”

Lively, 37, First Sued Baldoni, 41, Who Was Her Director and Costa in the Film, Back in December, Him of Sexual Haressment, “Disturbing” and “unprofessional” Behavior on Set, and a Retaliatory Smear Campaign.

Baldoni denied The Allegations and Filled to Countersuit in January Alleging Defamation and Extortion Against Lively, Her Husband Ryan Reynolds and Their Publicity Team.

In His Countersuit, Baldoni Claimed Swift and Reynolds Pressured Him into Accepting a Rewrite by Lively and described an alleged meeting at lively and reynolds’ Penthouse During Which the Singer “Began Praising Lively’s Script. Baldoni Understood The Subtext: Needed to Comley with Lively’s Direction. ”

Baldoni’s Lawyers Also Included An Alleged Text Exchange in Which Lively Combrad Herself To Khaleesi FROM game of Thrones and referred to her husband and swift as her “Dragons.”

The trial for Lively v. Wayfarer Studios et al., WHICH Will Cover Bash Lawsuits, Is Schedulated for March 2026.