The debate for the purchase of your own art

Taylor Swift could recover his original music. You will be wondering why he does not have the rights today and why right now he would have the opportunity to buy that music, some songs that She herself has composed and interpreted.
Although it may seem crazy that does not have your own music, that is the current situation. To explain this situation we have to go to what was your manager, Scooter Braunwhich is also known because he worked with artists such as Justin Bieber, Ariana Grande or David Guetta. It was after what happened with Taylor Swift when some celebrities stopped trusting him.
In 2018
Braun acquired the rights of the first six albums in Taylor, after his company, Ithaca Holdings, acquired the old stamp on which Swift wasBig Machine Label Group. After this transaction, of 300 billion dollars, Scooter decided to sell that musical catalog To a third (Shamrock Capital), without letting the artist buy her own music, composed entirely of her. From here the famous ones are born ‘Taylor’s version’ That Swift is launching, in order to recover his songs little by little. All songs, albums or projects that carry that brand belong to Taylor.
Why it is worth buying it and not just rewriting
Now Shamrock Capital is looking for a buyer for this musical catalog, having Swift itself in mind. Surprisingly there is a person who would be very in favor of this transaction, Scooter Braun. As confirmed by a nearby source in ‘Page Six’: “One of the individuals who is motivating this agreement is Scooter, who was at the center of the agreement the first time he sold the music“
This music would be composed of the albums ‘Taylor Swift’, ‘Fearless’, ‘Speak Now’, ‘Red’, ‘1989’ and ‘Reputation’. And if Taylor decided to recover his own music, he would have to pay about 600 million / billion euros. Although it looks like an astronomical figure, this purchase It would be profitable As Clayton Durant, founder of the musical consultant Cad Management.
“If I could recover them and create a structure in which you can recover the rights of your original recordings, would exponentially increase the money that would come to him“, he said.” He is making money from the publication of the original songs, much less than with his ‘Taylor’s version’. “
Interestingly, with each publication of its re-registered versions the consumption of the original said Durant. This could be because when listening to the new one you want to compare it with the principle version. “Shamrock’s team wants to make sure Taylor Know that they are trying to offer you this treatment, since they are not sure they have offered it the first time. “
The Own Taylor shared the following message in the Tumblr social network in 2019 that is still very alive in the minds of the Swifties: “Scooter has stripped me of the work of my life, which did not give me the opportunity to buy. In essence, My musical legacy is about to stay in the hands of someone who tried to dismantle it“
Internet debate
This news has not taken long for X, ancient Twitter, since his followers do not share that purchase from Taylor of his own music. “She should recover everything for free because it is your art. They stole it, “” Taylor doesn’t need to buy that because he’s getting better versions. We will only consume ‘Taylor’s version’ “,” Why should I pay for something he has created and that a man stole him? “
A follower took another step in this conversation, bringing to light previous news from the medium that has shared this information in the first place, ‘Page Six’. In these headlines it is appreciated that they are not the number 1 followers of the ‘Blank Space’ interpreter: “‘Page Six’ has historically been Scooter’s spokesman. They are not very skilled with these holders paid, trying to reconfigure the narrative in favor of Shamrock/Scooter. I doubt very much of the credibility of that ‘representative of musical consulting’ of which they speak. Do not fall into these shameless lies.” In the headlines you have collected we can read things as “Taylor Swift’s ‘reputation’ tour will be a disaster” or directly denying statements by the artist herself.