I don’t know who the owners of Bancolombia will now be after the shock to GEA, but the decisive shareholders should find out why this week Bancolombia has been restricted in some of the traditional activities that it has provided efficiently to so many millions of clients, despite the defects that appear every time the wise men of India turn their insides over for maintenance.
On the 21st, those of us who went to pay the Claro bill through the PSE found that in the menu of banking options offered for the transfer, Bancolombia no longer appeared. I shouted through X asking if anyone knew why Bancolombia was banned from paying for PSE.
They answered me publicly through
I solved my problem by using my BBVA savings account, which was not banned that day. Five hours later, through X, they announced to me that the service had already been restored, but the cause remains a mystery because they do not communicate it.
Yesterday the scare was worse, I went to the Tuluá property page and began happily and contentedly to pay for the 6 small family properties through PSE from Bancolombia.
When I came to pay number 4 for $231,000, Bancolombia or the PSE told me over and over again that the transaction had been rejected due to risk policies. I am solving the problem by printing the receipts on my personal printer and then going to Tuluá to a photocopier where they convert them to laser and then going to Supergiros to pay in cash, like in the stone age and not in the age of GOU algorithms, the Aval group company that is said to be the one that signed the payment agreement with the mayor of Tuluá. These are the mysteries of banking genetics. Or hatred between bankers?
Comments
